Transition
jQuery has provided easy access to complicated core Javascript solutions in the past and has been shielding us from difficult workarounds for legacy browsers. But times have changed and many of those things can be done as easily using Javascript directly.
jQuery is a fast, small, and feature-rich JavaScript library. It makes interactions with HTML documents easy, and is widely used in web development to add features to web pages and to simplify the process of writing JavaScript. With a combination of versatility and extensibility, jQuery has changed the way that millions of people write JavaScript.
5 reasons, why you might want to stop using jQuery!
- jQuery is a large library, and loading it can add a significant amount of time to the page load time of your website. If your website doesn’t use many of the features provided by jQuery, it may be more efficient to use smaller, specialized libraries or to write your own code.
- Some developers prefer to use modern JavaScript features like classes and modules instead of the functional programming style used by jQuery.
- As web development has evolved, many of the tasks that jQuery was commonly used for can now be accomplished with vanilla JavaScript, which is plain JavaScript that does not use any additional libraries.
- Using jQuery can make it more difficult for other developers to understand and maintain your code, especially if they are not familiar with the library.
- In some cases, jQuery may not work as expected with certain versions of modern browsers, or it may not be optimized for mobile devices.
That being said, jQuery is still a popular and widely used library, and there are many valid reasons to continue using it. It is ultimately up to you to decide whether the benefits of using jQuery outweigh the potential drawbacks in your particular situation.
Benefits to using pure JavaScript
- Improved performance: Pure JavaScript code is generally faster than code that uses libraries, because it does not have the overhead of loading and interpreting the library.
- Smaller file size: Pure JavaScript code is generally smaller in file size than code that uses libraries, because it does not include the library code. This can result in faster loading times for your website or application.
- More flexibility: With pure JavaScript, you have complete control over the code, and you can customize it to fit your specific needs.
- Better understanding and control: By writing your own JavaScript code, you can gain a better understanding of how it works and how to troubleshoot any issues that may arise.
- Improved compatibility: Pure JavaScript code is more likely to work across different platforms and devices, because it does not depend on a specific library or framework.
- Easier maintenance: Pure JavaScript code is generally easier to maintain than code that uses libraries, because it does not require updating or maintaining the library code.
“You might not need jQuery”
Easily search and compare direct Javascript solutions to jQuery ….
How jQuery does it:
1 2 3 |
$.getJSON('/my/url', function (data) {}); |
Pure Javascript:
1 2 3 4 |
const response = await fetch('/my/url'); const data = await response.json(); |
or use UmbrellaJS
UmbrellaJS is a lightweight JavaScript library that provides a number of utility functions and features for working with DOM elements and handling events. It was designed to be small, fast, and easy to use, and it does not have any dependencies on other libraries.
Some of the features provided by UmbrellaJS include:
- Easy element selection and manipulation using CSS-style selectors
- Support for chaining multiple function calls on the same element
- A simple event system for handling events on elements
- Utility functions for working with arrays, objects, and strings
- Functions for handling AJAX requests and working with JSON data
UmbrellaJS is a good choice for developers who want a simple, lightweight library for working with DOM elements and handling events. It is especially well-suited for smaller projects or for developers who want to avoid the overhead of larger libraries like jQuery.
Selector demos:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
u('ul#demo li') u(document.getElementById('demo')) u(document.getElementsByClassName('demo')) u([ document.getElementById('demo') ]) u( u('ul li') ) u('<a>') u('li', context) |
Documentation
Migrate from jQuery
HTMX might be another way …
HTMX (HTML enhanced for asynchronous communication and XML) is a JavaScript library that allows you to add asynchronous communication and other interactive features to your web pages using HTML attributes and elements. It allows you to make AJAX (Asynchronous JavaScript and XML) requests and handle responses directly in your HTML, without the need for writing any JavaScript code.
HTMX works by intercepting events on HTML elements and making asynchronous requests based on the attributes you specify. For example, you can use the hx-get
attribute to make a GET request to a specified URL, and use the hx-trigger
attribute to specify an event that should trigger the request. You can also use the hx-target
attribute to specify an element on the page where the response should be inserted.
Here’s an example of how you might use HTMX to make a GET request and insert the response into a div
element:
1 2 3 4 5 |
<button hx-get="/some/url" hx-target="#target">Load Data</button> <div id="target"></div> |
When the button is clicked, HTMX will make a GET request to /some/url
and insert the response into the div
element with the id
of target
.
HTMX is designed to be easy to use and flexible, and it can be used to add a wide range of interactive features to your web pages.
I am currently using HTMX in one of my longterm projects and will be talking about it more in a separate article in the future !
HTMX Reference / Documentation
It is ultimately up to you to decide which approach is best for your particular project. Sometimes a combination is needed ;)